What
is ‘faith? That is a broad and undefined question. Strictly
defined it is: “complete trust, belief or confidence in someone or something.”
In
the Christian context, we apply that word ‘faith’ to our belief in a God that
is unseen, and to some degree, unknown to us.
We are especially challenged in our faith when we profess a triune God
who is distinctly revealed in three persons (Father, Son, & Holy Spirit)
but is still unified as one God. So we can’t
tell anyone how a triune God works…but
I believe we can confidently say why it
works.
Yes,
it takes elements of belief, trust and confidence in God, even though we have precious
little empirical evidence to prove it…at least scientifically. But we roll all those things of belief, trust
and confidence into one thing we call ‘faith’.
And we cling to that faith.
However,
for some, our faith doesn’t make sense. Some
might even say that absent cold hard facts of God, we have a ‘blind’ faith,
literally a faith that is without seeing; that we have a faith that isn’t rooted
in reality. Some say “If there is a God,
then let him show himself.” Others
cannot believe in a God who does not prevent evil, pain and hardship. The lack of ‘faith’ is found in the unresolved
question: “If there is a God, then why would he let this happen?”
![]() |
| Why doesn't God do something obvious, like paint his name on these mountains? Oh wait...maybe he did. |
As
a pastor, people ask me these questions; and as an ‘anointed’ representative of
God, they expect answers. I preface my response that for the first 37 years of
my life, I held the same perspective. I
could never detect any empirical evidence of God. From my vantage point, God didn’t reveal
himself to the world, let alone act in it.
Ergo, there wasn’t a God.
So
I can empathize with the perspective that faith isn’t a reasonable and rational
worldview. So I get it why faith in God doesn’t make total sense.
But
then I challenge people to look at it from the opposite perspective.
If
our objection to God is that he doesn’t reveal himself to us, that he doesn’t ‘prove’
himself to us. I like to ask “how then should he do it?” If we begin with the assumption that God wants
to be known (and I assume that he does), then what obstacles stand in the way
of an infinite God of the universe trying to communicate with finite beings in
physical world? How does God cross that
which separates us in order to make himself known?
I
remind people that we’ve been in this predicament before…we just don’t remember
it.
Think
of it this way: It’s undisputed scientific fact that everyone who has ever been
born at one time existed in a ‘different’ world before they came into this
one. That ‘world’ was our mother’s
womb. We can trace our beginnings back
to a time and space when an egg and a sperm came together in our mother’s womb,
and then wonders of nature took over, and we started to be formed into a
person.
![]() |
| We were all here at one point. |
And
while we are in our mother’s womb, we reach a point of developed where we start
pushing against our momma’s belly. We
are also become sentient enough to react to things that are going on outside of
our mother’s placenta. In short, we are
in alive. It may be a rudimentary form
of what we now consider alive, but we are alive none the less.
But
here is the thing…we had no idea about the larger world that existed beyond the
womb.
To
apply the same questions we do to God, could we have posed the same inquiries to our
own mom? While we were in the womb, could
we have said: “If there is a mom, then let her show herself to me!” Or while experiencing the exponential
physical growth, which has to be painful,
did we cry out: “How can there be a mom when I am suffering this kind of pain!”
Bottom
line, how could or would we know we had a mom while we were in her womb?
Now
that we have gone through the birth process, grown up and learned how to read
and think, those questions are obviously nonsensical. We understand the pragmatic proof of
pregnancy. But we need to keep in mind
that we dismiss those questions only because we now have the advantage of
standing outside the womb. We have the
benefit of hindsight, which is always 20/20.
But
we knew none of this when we were in the womb.
![]() |
| Hello! Can you hear me?!?! |
Imagine
for a moment if we had the ability to communicate with a baby in the womb. How would we respond to the questions of
existence and pain? I’m guessing when it
came to the issue of existence, we’d probably be saying something along the
lines of: “Your mom surrounds you. She
can’t reveal herself because you are inside of her.” As for the physical pain caused rapid
exponential growth in the womb, we could only offer reassurance that kind of
painful growth is necessary preparation for life outside of the womb. As painful as it is, without it we’d die.
But
obviously we can’t do that kind of communication. Even though babies in the womb are separated
from this world only by the thickness of their mother’s skin, the two shall
remain separated until the time is right for them to leave that ‘world’ and
enter this one. The best that a mother
can do is tenderly rub their belly and quietly sing lullabies to the one
insider of her.
If
all that is true; if all of that is reality; could we say the same about God?
Maybe
having ‘faith is an exercise of humility to admit that perhaps the process
isn’t quite done yet. Maybe ‘faith’ is
the perspective that we don’t have enough information to make completely
informed judgments about what is happening to us. Maybe ‘faith’ is realizing that this world
isn’t as good as it gets. Maybe ‘faith’ is an enduring patience for being
birthed from our mother’s womb into God’s own womb. Maybe ‘faith’ is the
realization that God surrounds us to the extent we can’t see it because we
don’t yet have the benefit of standing outside of it. Maybe the personal pain
and societal evil of the world is similar to the exponential physical growth
that happened inside the womb, with the difference being that it’s not about
our bodily development, but our spiritual formation.
Keep the faith,





